Because Wide Sargasso Sea takes place before the passage of the Married Woman's Property Act of 1870, Rochester gets Antoinette's family fortune. He says, "The thirty thousand pounds have been paid to me without question or condition. No provision made for her..." (WSS 63). But how could this money ever really belong to Antoinette if she had been economically controlled by Mr. Mason prior to her marriage? The entire marriage was just a financial transaction between Mr. Mason and Mr. Rochester, while Antoinette was again denied her independence. As a result of Mr. Mason and Mrs. Rochester's economic dominance, Antoinette has no physical property of her own. Antoinette only has her name, which was given to her by her mother, and her confusing cultural identity. Mr. Rochester eventually takes away both Antoinette's name and her identity, leaving her with no tangible or even intangible property. I think it's significant that Antoinette's name is s...