Skip to main content

The Patriarchy of Inheritance

Because Wide Sargasso Sea takes place before the passage of the Married Woman's Property Act of 1870, Rochester gets Antoinette's family fortune. He says, "The thirty thousand pounds have been paid to me without question or condition. No provision made for her..." (WSS 63). But how could this money ever really belong to Antoinette if she had been economically controlled by Mr. Mason prior to her marriage? The entire marriage was just a financial transaction between Mr. Mason and Mr. Rochester, while Antoinette was again denied her independence. 

As a result of Mr. Mason and Mrs. Rochester's economic dominance, Antoinette has no physical property of her own. Antoinette only has her name, which was given to her by her mother, and her confusing cultural identity. Mr. Rochester eventually takes away both Antoinette's name and her identity, leaving her with no tangible or even intangible property. 

I think it's significant that Antoinette's name is so similar to her mother's name, Annette. Even though Annette gives Antoinette very little emotional support in her childhood, they are connected by their names. According to scholar Nancy Harrison, "Rhys' inversion of the names of mother and daughter suggests an "identification"of the daughter with the mother even more pointedly than Rhys' text itself" (Kimmey 118). Antoinette's name is a powerful reminder of her maternal connection, while both women have been "driven mad" by their patriarchal environments. 

Antoinette's confusing identity doesn't neatly fit with one cultural or religious group, though she does experience a strong connection to the islands themselves. Her depections of Coulibri's natural landscape show a strong identification with the land, and Mr. Rochester takes away that connection. 

Throughout the course of Wide Sargasso Sea, Antoinette's property, name, and identity are stolen by men around her. This novel is a powerful example of patriarchy and its negative effects on women. 

Comments

  1. BettyNovember 17, 2018 at 4:15 PM

    I can definitely see how the patriarchy and Rochester take away Antoinette's identity either by not allowing her any property or locking her up in an attic far away from the land she loves. In addition to taking away Antoinette's identity, Rochester also tries to make Antoinette conform to his own identity. He calls Antoinette by the more English name of Bertha Mason. Also, Rochester gives Antoinette the identity of a "mad woman" instead of a person, which further negates Antoinette's agency and provides a convenient excuse for Rochester to control Antoinette and lock her up in his attic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Elizabeth RienstraNovember 17, 2018 at 7:40 PM

    Yes, definitely. I think you raise a good point about Antoinette's marriage simply being a financial transaction between Rochester and Mr. Mason. I think we all sort of believed that Antoinette would have had control over her own finances if she hadn't gotten married because Christophine said so, but would she really? If we take into account the creepy way Mr. Mason was prepping Antoinette for marriage at the end of part one, I think it's quite possible he never had any intent of letting her control her money.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

breaking the cycle

Ross Wilcox embodies toxic male violence. Ross' violence has no purpose other than to continue a series of pointless conflicts sparked by his own fear and insecurity. The cycle of violence goes back to Ross' father, an abusive man who put his own wife in the hospital for losing a couple postage stamps. But how did Ross' father become so violent? It's likely that he also had a traumatic past that forced him into a pattern of male violence. Jason struggles to cope with Ross' ruthless bullying because it seems that there's no right way to respond: anything he does will get him more hurt. In fact, there is no possible response that could make Ross stop because he is so firmly entrenched in a violent system. Ross is incapable of gratitude, even when Jason kindly returns his wallet, because he doesn't know how to express those emotions. But no matter how badly Jason has been bullied, he is able to empathize with Ross because he recognizes that Ross is trapped. ...
7 comments
Read more

Painting metaphorically

Ellison often uses metaphorical language to convey subtler points about his narrator's situation. My favorite example of this technique is when the narrator is hired to paint samples of Optic White for the Liberty Paint Company. First of all, the company's emphasis on complete whiteness is a play on how the white world expects conformity. The paint helps to enforce society's "white is right" rhetoric by whitewashing universities and government monements, which symbolizes how education and public history are controlled by white power. The narrator points out that black-owned space such as the Golden Day are free from this whitewashing because they don't accept white authority. During the paint factory scene, the narrator must navigate the same questions of submissiveness and subversiveness that his grandfather raises. He ruins the second batch of samples when he attemps to do his job right, and Kimbro is only satisfied by the samples that appear to have be...
3 comments
Read more

Butler's postmodernism

Octavia Butler's Kindred might not appear as startlingly postmodernist as other novels we've read ( Mumbo Jumbo, for example) but her writing presents a powerful challenge to the kind of unilateral, hegemonic narrative that postmodern texts sought to deconstruct.  The story unfolds on a Maryland plantation decades before emancipation, grounding Dana's experience in a time when slavery would have felt virtually inescapeable. Dana realizes that the rift between her time and Rufus' time is more than temporal or spatial, but the two environments she's pulled between demonstrate completely different assumptions about humanity. She and Kevin first seek to understand their new environment through their history books from back home, which provide essential information about past laws and regulations. However, the knowledge found in history books can't capture the real experience of living as a slave on Weylin's plantation. Recounting facts about such a brutal era...
6 comments
Read more