Skip to main content

What a strange lad

Do you remember inventing characters for yourself as a little kid? I remember that when I was six or seven I loved Star Trek games. I would pretend to be the captain of a huge starship (cardboard box) and I would zoom across galaxies (backyard) in search of new universes (garden bushes) and alien species (my sister). It was fun to pretend that I could bravely traverse space, even though I wasn't yet courageous enough to sleep without a night light.

I think these kinds of games are essential to kids as they grow up. Pretending to be a fearless intergalactic explorer or a badass superhero helps kids build the self-confidence they need to get through childhood. This kind of confidence is especially important during adolescence because young people must learn a balance between their personal identity and the values they've been taught.

Lately I've been thinking a lot about how my own childhood games compare to Stephen's. His imagination produces characters and scenes that are very different from the fantasies I imagined as a kid. At the tender age of six, Stephen imagines himself having a tragic illness that leads to his early death. He plans out his entire funeral service while recovering from a minor fever. When he's older, Stephen begins to think of himself as a brooding and mysterious poet who has suffered through a lifetime of heartbreak. He envisions himself as a tortured Byronic hero, the protagonist of a romance novel gone wrong. 

Stephen's "childhood games" don't seem to prepare him for growing up and developing a sense of self. Instead, his imagination pushes him further from his family and the real world around him. I understand that adolescence can be an alienating time, but this is especially true in Stephen's case. Part of his "tortured artist" persona means that he sees himself as superior to other kids and even adults in his life. Rather than his childhood games forming a basis for personal growth, Stephen's weird imagination makes him isolated and narcissistic. 


Comments

  1. I agree, I think Stephen's currently mentality isn't exactly setting him up for healthy relationships and self-confidence later in life. But I wouldn't exactly put the blame on him, you know? Maybe it's his surroundings that make him the way he is, like he doesn't really have the emotional support from his family or he doesn't really play with his siblings. I feel bad for Stephen, because I think the idea of the "tortured artist" is getting perpetuated and he's not going to be able to have healthy relationships as you said.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that Stephen might not be exactly what we would consider the "norm" for children in terms of imagination, but I also think his fantasies stem from something very common among children. It seems to me like Stephen is craving validation and attention, and his fantasies are what carry that out for him. In that way, I think the way he develops makes a lot of sad sense, though I hope going forward he will find more healthy (and slightly less vexing) ways to find acceptance and validation for himself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stephen really takes his games to the next level. I remember as a child being kind of curious about death. It was something I didn't really understand but wanted to learn more about it. I remember asking my mom a lot of questions about how death worked and what happens after you die. But death was never the focus of my childhood games. And the way Stephen thinks about death is definitely very different from normal childhood games. I feel like his imagination is heavily affected by the Catholic church and as you said, this may have caused some negative affects on his personality.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stephen is a very melodramatic kid. Not to generalize here, but I think that may be true of most artist types. Stephen is a theater major stuck in a child's body. I agree that it's kind of weird that he developed this way, and maybe it's the church's emphasis on shame and torture that Stephen adopts for himself.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think that growing up in the Catholic faith takes a large toll on the way a young child's brain works and develops, and we can tell that it affected Stephen's imagination. Every other sermon is about the afterlife, and Stephen recalls that he learned to torture himself on earth so as to not suffer in heaven. Those types of ideas probably were repeated from an early age, so since that's all he heard about, that's probably the first thing his mind leads him to think. Kind of sad, really.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

breaking the cycle

Ross Wilcox embodies toxic male violence. Ross' violence has no purpose other than to continue a series of pointless conflicts sparked by his own fear and insecurity. The cycle of violence goes back to Ross' father, an abusive man who put his own wife in the hospital for losing a couple postage stamps. But how did Ross' father become so violent? It's likely that he also had a traumatic past that forced him into a pattern of male violence. Jason struggles to cope with Ross' ruthless bullying because it seems that there's no right way to respond: anything he does will get him more hurt. In fact, there is no possible response that could make Ross stop because he is so firmly entrenched in a violent system. Ross is incapable of gratitude, even when Jason kindly returns his wallet, because he doesn't know how to express those emotions. But no matter how badly Jason has been bullied, he is able to empathize with Ross because he recognizes that Ross is trapped. ...

Painting metaphorically

Ellison often uses metaphorical language to convey subtler points about his narrator's situation. My favorite example of this technique is when the narrator is hired to paint samples of Optic White for the Liberty Paint Company. First of all, the company's emphasis on complete whiteness is a play on how the white world expects conformity. The paint helps to enforce society's "white is right" rhetoric by whitewashing universities and government monements, which symbolizes how education and public history are controlled by white power. The narrator points out that black-owned space such as the Golden Day are free from this whitewashing because they don't accept white authority. During the paint factory scene, the narrator must navigate the same questions of submissiveness and subversiveness that his grandfather raises. He ruins the second batch of samples when he attemps to do his job right, and Kimbro is only satisfied by the samples that appear to have be...

Butler's postmodernism

Octavia Butler's Kindred might not appear as startlingly postmodernist as other novels we've read ( Mumbo Jumbo, for example) but her writing presents a powerful challenge to the kind of unilateral, hegemonic narrative that postmodern texts sought to deconstruct.  The story unfolds on a Maryland plantation decades before emancipation, grounding Dana's experience in a time when slavery would have felt virtually inescapeable. Dana realizes that the rift between her time and Rufus' time is more than temporal or spatial, but the two environments she's pulled between demonstrate completely different assumptions about humanity. She and Kevin first seek to understand their new environment through their history books from back home, which provide essential information about past laws and regulations. However, the knowledge found in history books can't capture the real experience of living as a slave on Weylin's plantation. Recounting facts about such a brutal era...