Skip to main content

Breaking the nets

The opening scene of Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man begins with Stephen's father telling him a story about a moocow. Since this novel depicts the evolution of an artist - a storyteller - it's significant that the first story Stephen remembers comes from his father. Throughout his early childhood, Stephen looks up to his father and trusts everything he says. When he arrives at Clongowes, feeling lonely and scared, Stephen is guided by his father's advice to "never peach on a fellow". Stephen follows that advice, even when it means that Wells gets away with cruelly shoving him into a poop ditch. 

As he grows older, Stephen's perfect image of his father starts to fade. Stephen begins to notice his family's economic struggles and feels embarrassed that his family is constantly moving to smaller houses in rougher neighborhoods.  He disapproves of Simon's long reminiscent rambles about his youth in Cork and looks down upon his old friends, saying that "his mind seemed older than theirs: it shone coldly on their strifes and happiness and regrets like a moon upon a younger earth". By the time he joins the university, Stephen sees his father as a bumbling old fool who couldn't possibly understand the mind of a true artist such as himself.

Stephen's gradual disillusionment with his father mirrors his estrangement from Irish nationalism and the Catholic Church. He was raised to accept the authority of all forms of national, cultural, religious, and familial institutions, but as Stephen grows older he realizes a need to break free from the "nets" that restrict his artistic development. 

Rather than forming an identity that synthesizes the beliefs he's grown up with, Stephen's fierce sense of independence drives him to completely cut ties from everything he's ever known. This need for freedom is why Stephen abandons his family, forsakes the Church, and sets out for Europe to become a modern artist.

Comments

  1. This is very fascinating. At the beginning of the novel, Stephen's family was a constant presence. All of them had very significant importance to him. However, as the novel progresses and he leaves to go to a boarding school away from them, his connection with them fizzles out quickly. Some of them disappear from his memory. He begins to look down on his father, eventually even thinking about him as an idiot. He chooses to break his mother's heart for his own goals at the end of the novel. It seems like a necessary step for Stephen to become the artist he wishes to be, but I also think because of how disconnected he had already become with them, it was a much easier decision for him than it might seem to many of us. He even said he didn't love his mother, because he didn't know what love was. Ireland and the Church tore him away from his family from a young age, leaving him lonely in a school where he was often mocked and bullied, and no parents or friends to cling to. No wonder it may have seemed necessary to Stephen for him to distance himself from everybody to become an artist.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think our discussion today makes this observation even more complex and interesting. Yes, Stephen makes a big deal about exiling himself from his previous life. But, as we learned, he only writes about Dublin. While his physical being is far from the life he knew, his "spirit" remains heavily influenced by his childhood.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think this point has a lot to say about coming of age as a subject, since many of us find in our coming-of-age journeys that we start questioning those in authority and who we were raised to look up to. We come to wrestle with who we are as people, and wonder how much of it comes from the people we were brought up alongside, and how much if it is actually purely "us". As we see in Stephen's case (mirrored by Joyce's), he ends up leaving his family and Dublin yet focuses a lot of his writing and art on Dublin, meaning his upbringing is still rooted inside him, despite him being independent from his now-rejected society. This really connects with the talks we've had about coming of age in the very beginning of the semester, in which we could all really agree that coming of age is a loss as much as it is a gain, and every journey is vastly different.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really like your point about how coming of age involves both the loss of institutional values and the gain of new and independent ways of thinking. These losses and gains make us individuals with different ways of existing in the world. The end of Chapter 5 shows Stephen cutting himself off from older beliefs, and I think it would be interesting to see how Stephen learns and synthesizes new values once he leaves for Europe.

      Delete
  4. It's fascinating that many of the values such as religion, and nationalism defined what stephen rejects. I wonder how stephen dedalus would turn out in an atheist, liberal family. He seems so sure of his artistic and anti religious beliefs at the end of the novel, but they are very much defined as the opposite of earlier values. This is not necessarily wrong but i criticize the way stephen looks down on others for their beliefs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would be an interesting case study to see Stephen's reaction to his family had they had different beliefs, maybe it is the repression of Catholicism as well as it's deep roots in Ireland making it so prevalent that makes Stephen so disdainful of those who believe in it.

      Delete
  5. I think Stephen thinks the only way to find his identity and figure out who he is a person is to cut off and remove everything from his past. That includes his beliefs, family, friends, and any other things that potentially influence him. So that's I think he believes that in order for him to truly be an "artist", he has to isolate himself from his past.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm always struck by Simon Dedalus's final appearance in the novel, in the "journal entry" section at the very end: Stephen is with his nationalist pal Davin, and they run into his father, who suggests Stephen join a rowing team (!), and Stephen politely but dismissively "pretends to think it over." He sort of humors his father here, who is so fully out of touch with the guy Stephen has become. But Stephen is no longer angry or impatient; he just humors him until he goes away. This little vignette speaks volume as to how far his father has fallen in his estimation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

breaking the cycle

Ross Wilcox embodies toxic male violence. Ross' violence has no purpose other than to continue a series of pointless conflicts sparked by his own fear and insecurity. The cycle of violence goes back to Ross' father, an abusive man who put his own wife in the hospital for losing a couple postage stamps. But how did Ross' father become so violent? It's likely that he also had a traumatic past that forced him into a pattern of male violence. Jason struggles to cope with Ross' ruthless bullying because it seems that there's no right way to respond: anything he does will get him more hurt. In fact, there is no possible response that could make Ross stop because he is so firmly entrenched in a violent system. Ross is incapable of gratitude, even when Jason kindly returns his wallet, because he doesn't know how to express those emotions. But no matter how badly Jason has been bullied, he is able to empathize with Ross because he recognizes that Ross is trapped. ...

Painting metaphorically

Ellison often uses metaphorical language to convey subtler points about his narrator's situation. My favorite example of this technique is when the narrator is hired to paint samples of Optic White for the Liberty Paint Company. First of all, the company's emphasis on complete whiteness is a play on how the white world expects conformity. The paint helps to enforce society's "white is right" rhetoric by whitewashing universities and government monements, which symbolizes how education and public history are controlled by white power. The narrator points out that black-owned space such as the Golden Day are free from this whitewashing because they don't accept white authority. During the paint factory scene, the narrator must navigate the same questions of submissiveness and subversiveness that his grandfather raises. He ruins the second batch of samples when he attemps to do his job right, and Kimbro is only satisfied by the samples that appear to have be...

Butler's postmodernism

Octavia Butler's Kindred might not appear as startlingly postmodernist as other novels we've read ( Mumbo Jumbo, for example) but her writing presents a powerful challenge to the kind of unilateral, hegemonic narrative that postmodern texts sought to deconstruct.  The story unfolds on a Maryland plantation decades before emancipation, grounding Dana's experience in a time when slavery would have felt virtually inescapeable. Dana realizes that the rift between her time and Rufus' time is more than temporal or spatial, but the two environments she's pulled between demonstrate completely different assumptions about humanity. She and Kevin first seek to understand their new environment through their history books from back home, which provide essential information about past laws and regulations. However, the knowledge found in history books can't capture the real experience of living as a slave on Weylin's plantation. Recounting facts about such a brutal era...