Skip to main content

Two kinds of poets

Being thirteen is pretty rough, but that's especially true for Jason Taylor. His low social standing and embarrassing stammer make him incredibly self-conscious and uncomfortable in any interactions with other kids. But Jason also has a secret: he's a poet.

Poetry is an outlet for all of Jason's inner thoughts that he can't communicate with others. Jason's stammer makes it difficult for him to say what he means in front of other people because he's constantly scanning his sentences for trouble words and rewriting his speech to seem normal. Poetry is the only place where Jason can confidently say the things he can't in everyday life.

It's interesting to compare Jason with Stephen Dedalus from A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. They're both young men struggling to find their place in the world, and they're both talented poets, but their attitudes toward the rest of the world are completely different.

Stephen thinks that his artistic talents make him better than other people, so he doesn't care about fitting in or seeming "normal". Meanwhile, Jason is constantly preoccupied with how the other boys see him, and he'll do whatever it takes to remain a part of the group. Stephen identifies as an artist above all else, but Jason hasn't yet developed a clear identity. Because Jason doesn't know who he wants to be, he mimics the other boys in the hopes that they won't notice he's different.

Jason and Stephen offer two contrasting models for what it means to be a young artist. Jason hides his talent in a desperate effort to fit in while Stephen embraces his creativity but acts superior to everyone else. I think it's important for artists to have a healthy balance between the two perspectives: they should be proud of their craft while also accepting that poets are fundamentally the same as everyone else. I hope that Jason will develop a stronger artistic identity as he grows older, and I hope he'll keep his endearing character too.

Comments

  1. This is a really interesting comparison. I wonder though if Stephen outwardly acted superior to the people around him though, but regardless I think that this shows how many different modes of being and coming-of-age there are.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like this comparison. It's interesting also how the time period and the social dynamics of their lives. Stephen has always kind of been an outcast and so his poetry is his way of making him feel better about his standing, while Jason is already kind of in the social circle he wants to be in, and his poetry would be a one-way ticket to kicking him out of it, which is why he's embarrassed by it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hadn't even thought of comparing the two. They are so different in the way that they look at themselves and other people that it is hard to see something that they have in common, but that is one thing. I think this is one of those instances where you should be confident, but not full of yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oo I like this post! And you come to a conclusion that I often find myself coming to: balance is better (and healthier) than extreme. I find it interesting that, in both Jason and Stephen's cases, their love for poetry sets them apart. I see a similar dynamic at Uni. I feel like STEM is the "assumed," until proved otherwise. I've been referred to as the "Writing Center girl" before, which I think is really funny, because emphasis isn't placed on kids involved in STEM clubs or extracurriculars.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really like your insight! Yeah, as an artist I get told that artists are all crazy, weird outcasts, when quite often, an artist is someone who looks and acts just like you. I think it's really interesting how the time period ties into these two boys' stories - what about late 19th century society made it more acceptable for Stephen to delve into a poetic field? There are certainly other factors, too. I love how you phrased all this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great comparison. Jason and Stephen do have two very different personalities and shortcomings. I think Jason has the valuable skill of wanting to be with people and appreciate the things about them. Stephen's separation from others whom he considers "normal" might make him feel lonely at some point and have difficulty connecting with others which might affect his writing. Both are very skilled though.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

breaking the cycle

Ross Wilcox embodies toxic male violence. Ross' violence has no purpose other than to continue a series of pointless conflicts sparked by his own fear and insecurity. The cycle of violence goes back to Ross' father, an abusive man who put his own wife in the hospital for losing a couple postage stamps. But how did Ross' father become so violent? It's likely that he also had a traumatic past that forced him into a pattern of male violence. Jason struggles to cope with Ross' ruthless bullying because it seems that there's no right way to respond: anything he does will get him more hurt. In fact, there is no possible response that could make Ross stop because he is so firmly entrenched in a violent system. Ross is incapable of gratitude, even when Jason kindly returns his wallet, because he doesn't know how to express those emotions. But no matter how badly Jason has been bullied, he is able to empathize with Ross because he recognizes that Ross is trapped. ...

Painting metaphorically

Ellison often uses metaphorical language to convey subtler points about his narrator's situation. My favorite example of this technique is when the narrator is hired to paint samples of Optic White for the Liberty Paint Company. First of all, the company's emphasis on complete whiteness is a play on how the white world expects conformity. The paint helps to enforce society's "white is right" rhetoric by whitewashing universities and government monements, which symbolizes how education and public history are controlled by white power. The narrator points out that black-owned space such as the Golden Day are free from this whitewashing because they don't accept white authority. During the paint factory scene, the narrator must navigate the same questions of submissiveness and subversiveness that his grandfather raises. He ruins the second batch of samples when he attemps to do his job right, and Kimbro is only satisfied by the samples that appear to have be...

Butler's postmodernism

Octavia Butler's Kindred might not appear as startlingly postmodernist as other novels we've read ( Mumbo Jumbo, for example) but her writing presents a powerful challenge to the kind of unilateral, hegemonic narrative that postmodern texts sought to deconstruct.  The story unfolds on a Maryland plantation decades before emancipation, grounding Dana's experience in a time when slavery would have felt virtually inescapeable. Dana realizes that the rift between her time and Rufus' time is more than temporal or spatial, but the two environments she's pulled between demonstrate completely different assumptions about humanity. She and Kevin first seek to understand their new environment through their history books from back home, which provide essential information about past laws and regulations. However, the knowledge found in history books can't capture the real experience of living as a slave on Weylin's plantation. Recounting facts about such a brutal era...