Skip to main content

Zoot rhymes with suit

When the narrator spots three young men on the subway in zoot suits, I had several questions. First of all, why is the narrator so enthralled by these boys? Hasn't he seen kids wearing wacky things before? Why does he decide to follow them? And most importantly, what is a zoot suit? Here's what I found
about the flamboyant zoot suit. 

The zoot suit was never exactly invented by any one person, and it isn't connected to any brands or designers. Oversize suits became popular among young, working-class men, most of whom were African-American or Latino, around the late 1930's and early 1940's. These young men, often called "zoot suiters", would buy larger suits and adjust them to make dancing easier. That's why zoot suits have wide pants that taper at the ankles -- you don't want to trip over floppy pant legs while dancing. Zoot suits were usually colorful and were paired with fun hats for extra snazziness.

The zoot suit grew in popularity during the early 1940's, especially in Mexican-American immigrant communities. However, wartime rationing restricted zoot suiters from acquiring enough fabric to make their favorite clothes. The rationing resulted in a week of violent attacks across Los Angeles where U.S. soldiers targeted Mexican-American zoot suiters for their "unpatriotic" outfits. Because of these attacks, the zoot suit took on important political significance. Ralph Ellison later wrote that zoot suits had a "profound political meaning".

So how does the zoot suit's historical context connect to the subway scene in Invisible Man? The narrator describes the three young men as "outside the groove of history", though his view of history is rather narrow. The brotherhood's scientific approach to political action fails to account for cultural change, as exemplified by the three zoot suiters on the subway. While the Brotherhood sees young people as foolish and inconsequential, historians today are still compelled by the political significance of cultural movements such as zoot-suiting. The narrator is so enthralled by the young men because he can finally see the importance of their lives as both individuals and as part of humanity's history. 

Cab Calloway, a 1940's jazz musician, showing off his fun zoot suit

Comments

  1. I absolutely agree. Ellison uses the young men in zoot suits to show the narrator some of the flaws in the Brotherhood's view of history. As you said they show the narrator how the Brotherhood has essentially been ignoring all these cultural movements that we find so fascinating decades later, but it also forces the narrator to reconsider the Brotherhood's habit of treating people only as members of groups. The zoot suiters mean so much more than that. Their suit can be unique, almost an expression of personality. While they might be black the first thing you'll notice is the flashy colors that show off who they are as an individual, contrasting the view of the world that's been forced upon the narrator by the brotherhood.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This deeper meaning of the zoot suiters is incredibly interesting, as it is such a small scene, but holds such powerful meaning. As you said, the zoot suiters show the brotherhoods dismissal of cultural movements that fascinate people, and also forces the narrator to think about this in relation to the brotherhood as a whole. Do they view people as more than members of a group, or do they simple mesh people together and dismiss the unique parts that make them individuals. Though, as Aryan mentioned, the zoot suiters are all black, their clear uniqueness and expression so vividly portrayed through their clothing cannot simply be ignored, as the small minded brotherhood members wish to do. This clashes with the narrow mindset the narrator has been taught to view the world through, and forces him to think.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you. I think the men in the zoot suits represent a change in cultural history that the narrator at the time with his Brotherhood views cannot see as anything but insignificant. Maybe another thing that the narrator thinking the zoot suiters are ridiculous shows is the things that seem outlandish to one generation can seem perfectly natural to the next one. Take radical ideology: what people at Ellison's time thought were radical social movements seem like givens today. The narrator sees a new trend among a demographic of young people and thinks it's absurd but it is the future of fashion for this young generation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Zoot-Suited men also help to prompt the narrator's realization that the Brotherhood is ultimately wrong, and drive him to later become one of them for a night, when he buys his dark sunglasses and is repeatedly misidentified as Rinehart. Ellison's use of the zoot suit is especially interesting in comparison with the narrator's earlier comments about the "pretenders", whose style he also describes in detail, but is even more condescending towards.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

breaking the cycle

Ross Wilcox embodies toxic male violence. Ross' violence has no purpose other than to continue a series of pointless conflicts sparked by his own fear and insecurity. The cycle of violence goes back to Ross' father, an abusive man who put his own wife in the hospital for losing a couple postage stamps. But how did Ross' father become so violent? It's likely that he also had a traumatic past that forced him into a pattern of male violence. Jason struggles to cope with Ross' ruthless bullying because it seems that there's no right way to respond: anything he does will get him more hurt. In fact, there is no possible response that could make Ross stop because he is so firmly entrenched in a violent system. Ross is incapable of gratitude, even when Jason kindly returns his wallet, because he doesn't know how to express those emotions. But no matter how badly Jason has been bullied, he is able to empathize with Ross because he recognizes that Ross is trapped. ...

Painting metaphorically

Ellison often uses metaphorical language to convey subtler points about his narrator's situation. My favorite example of this technique is when the narrator is hired to paint samples of Optic White for the Liberty Paint Company. First of all, the company's emphasis on complete whiteness is a play on how the white world expects conformity. The paint helps to enforce society's "white is right" rhetoric by whitewashing universities and government monements, which symbolizes how education and public history are controlled by white power. The narrator points out that black-owned space such as the Golden Day are free from this whitewashing because they don't accept white authority. During the paint factory scene, the narrator must navigate the same questions of submissiveness and subversiveness that his grandfather raises. He ruins the second batch of samples when he attemps to do his job right, and Kimbro is only satisfied by the samples that appear to have be...

Butler's postmodernism

Octavia Butler's Kindred might not appear as startlingly postmodernist as other novels we've read ( Mumbo Jumbo, for example) but her writing presents a powerful challenge to the kind of unilateral, hegemonic narrative that postmodern texts sought to deconstruct.  The story unfolds on a Maryland plantation decades before emancipation, grounding Dana's experience in a time when slavery would have felt virtually inescapeable. Dana realizes that the rift between her time and Rufus' time is more than temporal or spatial, but the two environments she's pulled between demonstrate completely different assumptions about humanity. She and Kevin first seek to understand their new environment through their history books from back home, which provide essential information about past laws and regulations. However, the knowledge found in history books can't capture the real experience of living as a slave on Weylin's plantation. Recounting facts about such a brutal era...